The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath follows a girl named Esther Greenwood. For the majority of her life, Esther has known winning scholarships. After all, thats the whole reason why Esther has an apprenticeship for a fashion magazine in New York City. Though, with the standards of being a woman in a judgmental society, Esther will find herself gradually succumbing to insanity. This book had its moments where I felt I should stop reading it. Some of the ideas in this book can still be applied to today's society though, many of the ideas are outdated. For one, at the very beginning, we see language that targets minority groups. There are outdated terms used that are harmful stereotypes to this day. There was one part of the book that disturbed me when Esther kicked a black man because he served two different platters of beans to her. Can this "feminist" book be considered groundbreaking if the language brings down other oppressed groups? I understand that this book was written decades ago, but it seems like a lousy excuse to me to bring down minorities. I will admit, though, I did enjoy some of the metaphors in the novel and some of the foreshadowing. One instance is on page one when Esther states, "...but I couldn't help wondering what it would be like, being burned alive all along your nerves," which foreshadows the electrotherapy that Esther is going to receive later in the novel. Though, these metaphors do not change the fact that this book had some harmful stereotypes in it. Overall, certain parts of this book were upsetting, and I feel as though there are most likely many books out there that have aspects of feminism that advocate for POC and other oppressed minorities.